iTablet? Yes, please!

30 09 2009

Having just read the following article….
http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/09/30/apple.rumored.putting.text.on.itunes/
(Courtesy Electronista.com)

….I admit I’m smitten with the idea of an Apple “Tablet PC” ? Until Jobs & Co. come up with another name, I figure we’ll just refer to it as the iTablet….a great idea….a tablet computer powered by Mac OSX. Granted, Axiotron has something similar, but to have a factory Mac tablet that (possibly) could run iPhone apps is just it. What this also tells me is there is a possibility that Dashboard in OSX might be modified either in Snow Leopard (or the next Apple kitty) to power iPhone apps on the desktop.

THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!

I had a Windows-based Tablet PC at one time (Review: C|Net HP TX1000US) and had to return it because of two major hinderances (and one minor)…..battery life and writing quality. I had to keep the pen under constant, constant pressure which is a lot harder than it sounds. What it means is if I did not have adequate pen pressure throughout the whole written word, it would leave gaps in the words–this is unlike writing with a normal ballpoint which simply puts ink on paper. The minor issue I had with the HP Tablet was Windows Vista, which isn’t really minor but mostly relating to stability (like this….)

tx1320us bad screen

…and this….

pic 005

…and this….

pic 006

How did all this happen? God knows….all I know is I had gone to HP’s website and updated all the driver software via the HP Update utility and their website. To HP’s ever-loving credit, their customer service was very good and helped me as much as they could. I do think that if I had been running Windows XP the above issues might not have happened…..the one with the vertical lines was right after I turned it on, plugged in the monitor, and BOOM…..the machine was locked and I had to hard-reboot it.

That was my last experience with a tablet Windows PC (very last).





Bad product placement….

13 09 2009

As posted on C|Net, apparently someone has a bit of bad taste for how they placed an ad next to their article on Steve Jobs’ return to Apple.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10351348-71.html

Bad form, period.  Didn’t someone stop to think, “Hey, maybe we shouldn’t even associate Jobs’ condition w/ anything even remotely morbid, considering his condition?”





Got my new Nano :)

13 09 2009

…..I’ll write more on it later, but it really is a nice little device and the video is amazing. I will have a small review on it sometime this week.

JG





MobileMe….worth it? Article by Andy Inhatko.

13 09 2009

I came across this article on Macworld the other day, and thought I should comment….

Why MobileMe is really worth it | Web Services | MacUser | Macworld
by Andy Inhatko

I thought this was a good article…..he mentions some of the gripes people (like me) have had w/ MobileMe, as well as some of the unsung benefits of the service.





AppleTV, cracking Macbook… grrr!

8 09 2009

Well, as it turns out….our illustrious AppleTV is on the blink again.  This is the third time I’ve done a factory restore on the thing and it’s still acting up.  I’m going to take it in to the Apple Store tomorrow and get it taken care of….once and for all.  First, the AppleTV cannot decide what resolution it wants to use…. 720p….1080i….1080p….720p….1080p….back to 720p…. GRRR!!!

At best, I figured the AppleTV was just finicky, but this has gone way beyond finicky…..now we are seeing that if we change source on our TV set (HDMI1, HDMI2, HDMI3, Component1, etc.etc.), the AppleTV (on HDMI1) will whig-out and not come back, necessitating a complete hard reset.  Can’t do much about it except just reset and restore….well, not no more (hey, I rhymed something!).  I guess it doesn’t help that Mrs. Guapo’s white Macbook is cracking again….we just had it in the store 5 months ago for a complete plastic “surgery”, they replaced ALL the plastics…..bottom, top, lid, etc.  A month ago, her screen had to be replaced b/c it was unusually dim….she would have to have it on full brightness to be readable.  To their credit, they have fixed everything we have taken in almost hassle-free.  We’re optimistic this will be an easy fix, but I’m always skeptical.

Last night, we’re on the couch and she brings me her notebook….sure enough, cracks along the front.  The bad part is she starts work this week (teacher) and needs her computer this week more than ever.  We’ll see how well they fix it this time, and how quickly.





What would Brian Boitano make?

7 09 2009

Excellent show…. one of my favorite shows on Food Network. :)
Food Network :: What Would Brian Boitano Make?





Yahoo up to 25MB attachments (soon!)

7 09 2009

It looks like Yahoo is going to update their mail system once again….

http://www.ymailblog.com/blog/2009/08/an-enhanced-yahoo-mail/

From what I gather, it looks like everyone will have 25MB e-mail attachments (same as Gmail now) and a more re-organized mail window for starters.  Attachment limits are not a huge deal to me since I don’t send massive e-mail attachments (1MB at best) but I imagine this will mean a lot to those who send gargantuan e-mail attachments.  The re-organized window in Y!Mail also looks much cleaner than I’m used to.

On that topic, I don’t see anything that was wholly wrong w/ Yahoo to begin with but it looks like they’re just refining and refinding their service to compete w/ Gmail.  This is truly one of the best things about our Internet ecosystem–big technology companies are competing to give us (the end user) the best free e-mail address they can.  Granted, in return there are some drawbacks (ie. ads ads ads) but somehow we don’t mind buying a big-screen TV set to watch movies and (you guessed it) those pesky advertisements in-between.  I’ll bet if you averaged it out, you spend 20% of your TV watching just sitting in front of a commercial…..so how is e-mail any different?

One thing I will point at and wave my finger is Gmail.  Before I start, I will say that I both have and use Gmail; in fact, I have two Gmail accounts–one personal and one university via Google Apps.  I think Gmail is a really, really, really (repeat another 5 times) good e-mail system–it’s fast, fairly reliable, and does what it advertises (pun?) to do.  However, I do not use Gmail as my primary e-mail source, that job goes to Yahoo (and MobileMe prior to that).

I don’t like Gmail very much–there, I said it. That’s not to say it’s the worst e-mail system out there, in fact I’ll save my rant about Apple’s MobileMe for another time, but for now I’m going to just talk about Gmail.

Gmail is really good at aggregating the content of my e-mail for the purpose of serving me advertising.  Granted, I had my tin-foil hat out in the beginning and thought that Gmail was out to profile its users and read each/every e-mail, I’ve since put it away and accepted it; “if it’s good enough for the University system, it’s good enough for me!” is my motto.  However, this still doesn’t mean I have to like it.

First of all, I find Gmail to be very…….bland, cold, and uninviting–it’s almost too utilitarian for my taste.  In Gmail, there’s plenty of white-space, text, and that’s about it.  When I open my e-mail, there’s a nice list of links and advertisements based soley on the data provided to Google from the content of my e-mail.  I used to joke about this w/ a friend of mine who is also a Gmail user by sending him e-mail w/ words like rogaine, hair loss, and ED treatments at the very bottom, and he’d get links about medical hair restoration.  The funny thing is I’m the bald one but I still got a kick out of it.  Anyway, I digress….

Second, while ads are a necessity in these days of free e-mail, it should not have to be based on the content of my e-mail.  Privacy issues aside, no-one likes to have their e-mail read (even by a computer) but this is not just for spam protection.  I understand spam protection and have no issue w/ a computer reading/scanning my e-mail for the purposes of spam, but using that same data to aggregate advertisements is just plain annoying (if not questionable).  Sorry, I use Gmail but not as my primary for this purpose–it really says something when the University account I have has the ads turned off….it makes you wonder what legalities (if any) there are for keyword aggregating in an academic environment.

Third issue is IMAP support.  Gmail’s IMAP support just plain sucks, and you do get what you pay for in this sense.  Gmail’s POP3 support is probably the best of any provider (web or otherwise) because it will archive any e-mail sent through Gmail’s SMTP server onto the server (giving you a little bit of IMAP support in a POP3 setting); however, client-side IMAP support interferes with Gmail’s labeling system immensely.  Moreover, there is NO WAY to unsubscribe specific IMAP folders in Apple Mail (as of this writing).  I turned off IMAP and went w/ straight old POP3 the 2nd day I tried to use it w/ Gmail.  However, Gmail support for the iPhone is pretty good (sans Push notification).  I would not recommend Gmail to anyone who prefers a true IMAP experience.  My university Gmail account is the only one I use w/ IMAP on Gmail, and it took me several days to get it set up just right, but there are still quirks (Archive vs. Delete) that get in the way at times.

Gmail is really good at e-mail, but that doesn’t mean it makes me “want” to e-mail…. Yahoo, on the other hand, makes me want to stay in my e-mail for a few more minutes….read/write/respond, and then leave it.  I think I’m about as geeky as they come, but I regret to say that I think Gmail is too geeky for my taste (like Linux).  I’m a Mac user, so I see things through the eye of a Mac owner–if it is not drop-dead simple to use, then it’s not worth using.  I’m not saying Gmail is too advanced for me to use, but I find it too rigid of an e-mail environment if that makes sense.

Yahoo Mail always seems to play well w/ others, and in my experience seems to have less downtime than Gmail.  In the world of Y!Mail vs. Gmail, I’ll go w/ Yahoo Mail over Gmail.

Lastly, if Yahoo does one thing really well, it has to be Mail.  If Google does one thing really well, it is most-definitely search.  There are some things that one will obviously do better than the other, and vice-versa, but I think it’s safe to say that one should never try to out-Google….Google, or out-Apple….Apple.  In other words, listen up Yahoo and/or Google….play to your strengths, it is a method that will always serve you well.  After all, Y!Answers dwarfed Google Answers into extinction while making Google the largest search engine on the Internet.





Blog entry for Sunday, 9/6

6 09 2009

So who else upgraded to Snow Leopard 10.6? Anyone? I did….installed it on three of our Macs and thus far it has been phenomenal as far as speed, but there have been some other (ahem) hiccups.

1) Flip4Mac WMV viewer doesn’t like Snow Leopard AT ALL. However, the folks at Telestream have been gracious enough to provide us Snow Leopard folks with a beta of their Snow Leopard compatible version of Flip4Mac. I don’t open/view WMV files a lot but when I do, it’s nice to be able to do it in Quicklook and/or Quicktime. I do recommend VLC Player as a backup, though. ::rattling fingers on desk::

2) Quicklook + .MPG files are not the best of friends, either. For instance, Quicklook (QL for short) will open just about anything you throw at it, however, do not open too many MPG files in succession, or while one is still playing and quickly flip to another video. It just doesn’t like it, period. What happens is the Finder will eventually just hang, necessitating a Relaunch which isn’t the biggest inconvenience in the world, but still a bug. I never had this problem under Leopard, and have been able to replicate it on another one of my Macs as well. ::bangs head on desk::

3) Microsoft Office 2008 needed a re-install b/c it just kept crashing, esp. in Notebook view. I haven’t had the time/patience to re-install it yet but I’m getting there. Since iWork ‘09 is my daily driver, I’m not in any hurry. At least I know I’m not the only one w/ this issue. ::head is bleeding on desk::

Lastly, I think I should mention one thing that needs to be addressed….. This Update vs. Clean Install debate needs to be put to rest b/c most of us (80% or greater) that use our Macs on a pretty demanding schedule do not have the time to re-install an OS. Apple knows this and has made it very easy to do the upgrade to Snow Leopard.

All in all, it’s definitely worth the $29 upgrade but maybe not right now……wait until the first update is available if you can.





AppleInsider | Microsoft discontinues hard drives, “squircle” from Zune lineup

4 09 2009




inFamous

4 09 2009

One of my favorite games right now on the PS3….best to watch it in HD full screen.